IBMM vs. JMSI
IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) and JMSI (J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. IBMM is passively managed, while JMSI is actively managed. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
IBMM vs. JMSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBMM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMSI
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMM vs. JMSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMM vs. JMSI — Risk / Return Rank
IBMM
JMSI
IBMM vs. JMSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMM | JMSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.04 | — |
Drawdowns
IBMM vs. JMSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum JMSI drawdown of -4.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMM and JMSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMM | JMSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -4.57% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.68% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.92% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.86% | — |
Volatility
IBMM vs. JMSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMM | JMSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 2.92% | -2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.73% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 3.73% | -3.73% |
IBMM vs. JMSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBMM and JMSI have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBMM vs. JMSI - Dividend Comparison
IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund | 3.64% | 3.65% | 3.66% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBMM and JMSI have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
JMSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan.
Find the right allocation for IBMM and JMSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer