IBIG vs. SCHP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP).
IBIG and SCHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBIG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. It was launched on Sep 19, 2023. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both IBIG and SCHP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBIG vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBIG vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 0.60% | 7.90% | 2.60% | 4.26% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.37% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 4.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.37% return.
IBIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBIG vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IBIG vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIG
SCHP
IBIG vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIG | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 0.71 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 0.98 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.03 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | 3.07 | +3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIG | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.71 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.50 | +0.90 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIG and SCHP is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IBIG vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than SCHP's 3.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 3.93% | 4.70% | 4.15% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.72% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
IBIG vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and SCHP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIG | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -14.26% | +11.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -2.78% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -1.35% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -3.97% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 0.94% | -0.34% |
Volatility
IBIG vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) is 1.01%, while Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that IBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBIG | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 1.36% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.71% | 2.22% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33% | 4.04% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 6.13% | -1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 5.60% | -1.21% |