IBIG vs. SCHP
IBIG (iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIG tracks the ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index while SCHP tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIG returned 2.22% vs 1.85% for SCHP. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IBIG charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
IBIG vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIG achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.76% return.
IBIG
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.55%
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $679.00K | $533.74K | $737.22K | |
| $129.98M | $109.08M | $111.33M |
IBIG vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 1.19% | 7.90% | 2.60% | 4.26% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.76% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIG and SCHP is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between IBIG and SCHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIG vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIG
SCHP
IBIG vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIG | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.10 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.96 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 2.56 | +1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIG vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIG drawdown since its inception was -3.21%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIG and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIG | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -14.26% | +11.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | -1.93% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -1.09% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -3.90% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.72% | -0.19% |
Volatility
IBIG vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF (IBIG) is 0.45%, while Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) has a volatility of 0.67%. This indicates that IBIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIG | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | 0.67% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.86% | 2.44% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51% | 3.20% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 6.11% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 5.58% | -1.37% |
IBIG vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIG vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
IBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than SCHP's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIG iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term TIPS ETF | 5.52% | 4.70% | 4.15% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 5.03% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIG and SCHP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHP has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to IBIG (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIG dropped -3.21% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 1-year performance, IBIG leads with 2.22% vs 1.85% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IBIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIG has performed better with a 2.22% return vs 1.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIG.
IBIG has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 5.03% for SCHP.
IBIG tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIG and 0.03% for SCHP.
IBIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIG and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer