PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIC vs. IBIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIC vs. IBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIC achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than IBIF's 1.91% return.


IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIF

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
1.91%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIC vs. IBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%5.25%2.47%
IBIF
iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF
1.91%7.27%3.11%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIC and IBIF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between IBIC and IBIF has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIC vs. IBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIF
IBIF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIC vs. IBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBICIBIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.24

1.49

+0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.27

5.25

+12.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

67.45

17.34

+50.11

IBIC vs. IBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIC Sharpe Ratio is 5.05, which is higher than the IBIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIC and IBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBICIBIFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.05

2.46

+2.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.49

1.72

+1.77

Drawdowns

IBIC vs. IBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIC drawdown since its inception was -0.90%, smaller than the maximum IBIF drawdown of -2.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIC and IBIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBICIBIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-2.50%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.26%

-0.95%

+0.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.11%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.55%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.29%

-0.22%

Volatility

IBIC vs. IBIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) is 0.33%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF) has a volatility of 0.46%. This indicates that IBIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBICIBIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

0.46%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.67%

1.33%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90%

2.03%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.58%

3.55%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.58%

3.55%

-1.97%

IBIC vs. IBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIC and IBIF have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIC vs. IBIF - Dividend Comparison

IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than IBIF's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
IBIF
iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF
3.74%4.51%4.05%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIC and IBIF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIF has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIC dropped -0.90% vs IBIF's -2.50%.

On 1-year performance, IBIF leads with 4.97% vs 4.54% for IBIC. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIF has performed better with a 4.97% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC and IBIF have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while IBIF tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIC and IBIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer