IBHM vs. TLT
IBHM (iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHM is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
IBHM vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHM
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- -1.27%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- -1.67%
- 5Y*
- -6.27%
- 10Y*
- -1.56%
IBHM vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 2.83% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHM and TLT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHM vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
IBHM
TLT
IBHM vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHM | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.97 | 0.26 | +2.71 |
Drawdowns
IBHM vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHM drawdown since its inception was -1.67%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHM and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHM | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -48.35% | +46.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -40.31% | +40.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.43% | -13.82% | +13.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.05% | — |
Volatility
IBHM vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHM | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.37% | 9.77% | -4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 15.86% | -10.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 14.90% | -9.53% |
IBHM vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHM vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
IBHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than TLT's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHM and TLT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHM.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.08% for IBHM.
IBHM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TLT is Government Bonds. IBHM tracks Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHM and 0.15% for TLT.
Find the right allocation for IBHM and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer