IBHM vs. HYZD
IBHM (iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and HYZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHM tracks the Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index while HYZD tracks the WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond, Zero Duration Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBHM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for HYZD.
Performance
IBHM vs. HYZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHM
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYZD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 2.83%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
IBHM vs. HYZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 2.60% |
HYZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHM and HYZD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHM vs. HYZD — Risk / Return Rank
IBHM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYZD
IBHM vs. HYZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBHM | HYZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBHM vs. HYZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHM drawdown since its inception was -1.67%, smaller than the maximum HYZD drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHM and HYZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHM | HYZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -25.66% | +23.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.40% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.43% | -2.19% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.45% | — |
Volatility
IBHM vs. HYZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHM | HYZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.29% | 3.04% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 6.71% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 8.54% | -3.25% |
IBHM vs. HYZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYZD's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHM vs. HYZD - Dividend Comparison
IBHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than HYZD's 5.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund | 5.88% | 6.05% | 6.08% | 5.94% | 5.14% | 4.02% | 5.13% | 5.50% | 5.58% | 4.94% | 5.07% | 4.38% |
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHM and HYZD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBHM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBHM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HYZD.
HYZD has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 1.08% for IBHM.
IBHM tracks Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while HYZD tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond, Zero Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHM and 0.43% for HYZD.
Find the right allocation for IBHM and HYZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer