IBHM vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IBHM (iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHM is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBHM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

IBHM vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBHM

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWI

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 6M: 8.77%
• 1Y: 23.79%
• 3Y*: 19.95%
• 5Y*: 10.62%
• 10Y*: 13.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHM vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF	2.60%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHM and ACWI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	0.86

Return for Risk

IBHM vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 59
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHM vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHM) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBHM	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.76	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.66	—

Drawdowns

IBHM vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHM drawdown since its inception was -1.67%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHM and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHM	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-56.00%	+54.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.73%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-2.96%	+2.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-8.59%	+8.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBHM	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.35%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.29%	13.62%	-8.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.29%	16.19%	-10.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.29%	17.07%	-11.78%

IBHM vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBHM vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IBHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than ACWI's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.46%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
IBHM iShares iBonds 2033 Term High Yield and Income ETF	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHM and ACWI in my portfolio?

IBHM and ACWI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBHM or ACWI?

On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHM or ACWI?

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHM or ACWI?

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.08% for IBHM.

What is the main difference between IBHM and ACWI?

IBHM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ACWI is Global Equities. IBHM tracks Bloomberg 2033 Term High Yield and Income Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHM and 0.32% for ACWI.