IBDT vs. LIF
IBDT (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index, while LIF (Life360, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, IBDT returned 4.61% vs -25.93% for LIF. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBDT vs. LIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDT achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than LIF's -29.45% return.
IBDT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.25%
- 10Y*
- —
LIF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- -29.45%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- -25.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBDT vs. LIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF | 0.92% | 7.02% | 3.24% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | -29.45% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDT and LIF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDT vs. LIF — Risk / Return Rank
IBDT
LIF
IBDT vs. LIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBDT | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 0.97 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.38 | -0.43 | +4.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.12 | -0.70 | +20.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBDT vs. LIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum LIF drawdown of -65.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDT and LIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDT | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -65.64% | +47.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.03% | -65.64% | +64.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -59.19% | +59.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -21.35% | +17.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.22% | 40.82% | -40.60% |
Volatility
IBDT vs. LIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) is 0.44%, while Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a volatility of 16.67%. This indicates that IBDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDT | LIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 16.67% | -16.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.07% | 52.85% | -51.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61% | 67.08% | -65.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.07% | 62.97% | -57.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.36% | 62.97% | -56.61% |
Dividends
IBDT vs. LIF - Dividend Comparison
IBDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF | 4.54% | 4.56% | 4.67% | 4.10% | 3.25% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 3.32% | 1.47% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDT and LIF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (16.67%) compared to IBDT (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDT dropped -17.79% vs LIF's -65.64%.
IBDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDT and LIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer