PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IBDT vs. ERNA.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IBDTERNA.L
YTD Return3.50%5.02%
1Y Return8.22%5.98%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.30%3.94%
5Y Return (Ann)1.39%2.70%
Sharpe Ratio2.087.68
Sortino Ratio3.1315.96
Omega Ratio1.403.44
Calmar Ratio0.7358.05
Martin Ratio9.67197.65
Ulcer Index0.81%0.03%
Daily Std Dev3.75%0.77%
Max Drawdown-17.79%-8.63%
Current Drawdown-3.37%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between IBDT and ERNA.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

IBDT vs. ERNA.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IBDT achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than ERNA.L's 5.02% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.43%
2.84%
IBDT
ERNA.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBDT vs. ERNA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
Expense ratio chart for IBDT: current value at 0.10% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.10%
Expense ratio chart for ERNA.L: current value at 0.09% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.09%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBDT vs. ERNA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBDT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IBDT, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IBDT, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.97
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IBDT, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IBDT, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IBDT, currently valued at 8.94, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.94
ERNA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ERNA.L, currently valued at 7.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.007.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ERNA.L, currently valued at 15.64, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0015.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ERNA.L, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ERNA.L, currently valued at 56.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0056.85
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ERNA.L, currently valued at 193.96, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00193.96

IBDT vs. ERNA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the ERNA.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDT and ERNA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.0010.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.97
7.55
IBDT
ERNA.L

Dividends

IBDT vs. ERNA.L - Dividend Comparison

IBDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, while ERNA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021202020192018
IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
4.62%4.10%3.24%2.45%2.80%3.33%1.48%
ERNA.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBDT vs. ERNA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, which is greater than ERNA.L's maximum drawdown of -8.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDT and ERNA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.37%
0
IBDT
ERNA.L

Volatility

IBDT vs. ERNA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) at 0.32%. This indicates that IBDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.86%
0.32%
IBDT
ERNA.L