IBDQ vs. USL
IBDQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. IBDQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
IBDQ vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBDQ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
IBDQ vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 0.00% | 4.13% | 5.12% | 5.23% | -5.91% | -1.49% | 8.27% | 13.59% | -2.39% | 6.28% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 62.48% | -25.23% | 28.01% | -14.15% | 2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDQ and USL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015 | -0.05 |
The correlation between IBDQ and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDQ vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
IBDQ
USL
IBDQ vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDQ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.01 | — |
Drawdowns
IBDQ vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDQ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -89.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -38.16% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -61.46% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.27% | — |
Volatility
IBDQ vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDQ | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 28.54% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 30.08% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 32.35% | — |
IBDQ vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBDQ vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 2.08% | 3.77% | 3.81% | 3.27% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDQ and USL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBDQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBDQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
IBDQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
IBDQ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while USL is Oil & Gas. IBDQ tracks Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDQ and 0.88% for USL.
Find the right allocation for IBDQ and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer