IBDQ vs. IBDT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT).

IBDQ and IBDT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBDQ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. IBDT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2018. Both IBDQ and IBDT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IBDQ vs. IBDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IBDQ vs. IBDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF	0.00%	4.13%	5.12%	5.23%	-5.91%	-1.49%	8.27%	13.59%	-0.08%
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF	0.29%	7.02%	3.97%	7.72%	-11.42%	-1.90%	9.62%	15.15%	1.19%

Returns By Period

IBDQ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBDT

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 4.98%
• 3Y*: 5.17%
• 5Y*: 1.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDQ vs. IBDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBDQ and IBDT have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IBDQ

iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF

IBDT

iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF

Return for Risk

IBDQ vs. IBDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDT

IBDT Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IBDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBDT Omega Ratio Rank: 96
IBDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
IBDT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDQ vs. IBDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBDQ	IBDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.61	—

Correlation

The correlation between IBDQ and IBDT is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IBDQ vs. IBDT - Dividend Comparison

IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than IBDT's 4.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF	2.77%	3.77%	3.81%	3.27%	2.23%	2.07%	2.51%	3.21%	3.52%	3.28%	3.39%	2.64%
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF	4.57%	4.56%	4.67%	4.10%	3.25%	2.45%	2.80%	3.32%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IBDQ	IBDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-17.79%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.45%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.25%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBDQ	IBDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.17%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	5.11%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	6.44%	—