IBDQ vs. LQD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD).
IBDQ and LQD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBDQ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. LQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both IBDQ and LQD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBDQ vs. LQD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBDQ vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 0.00% | 4.13% | 5.12% | 5.23% | -5.91% | -1.49% | 8.27% | 13.59% | -2.39% | 6.28% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -0.38% | 7.90% | 0.86% | 9.40% | -17.92% | -1.84% | 10.97% | 17.37% | -3.79% | 7.06% |
Returns By Period
IBDQ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQD
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBDQ vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IBDQ vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank
IBDQ
LQD
IBDQ vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDQ | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.54 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDQ and LQD is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IBDQ vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison
IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than LQD's 4.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 3.11% | 3.77% | 3.81% | 3.27% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% |
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
Drawdowns
IBDQ vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDQ | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -24.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -4.52% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.99% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility
IBDQ vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBDQ | LQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.60% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 8.66% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 8.67% | — |