PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDQ vs. LQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBDQ vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBDQ vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
0.00%4.13%5.12%5.23%-5.91%-1.49%8.27%13.59%-2.39%6.28%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
-0.38%7.90%0.86%9.40%-17.92%-1.84%10.97%17.37%-3.79%7.06%

Returns By Period


IBDQ

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LQD

1D
0.63%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
2.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBDQ vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IBDQ vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDQ

LQD
LQD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDQ vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBDQ vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDQLQDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Correlation

The correlation between IBDQ and LQD is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IBDQ vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

IBDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than LQD's 4.52% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBDQ
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
3.11%3.77%3.81%3.27%2.23%2.07%2.51%3.21%3.52%3.28%3.39%2.64%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.52%4.48%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%

Drawdowns

IBDQ vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDQLQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

Volatility

IBDQ vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBDQLQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.67%