IAUM vs. FLKR
IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAUM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IAUM returned 17.35%/yr vs 14.07%/yr for FLKR. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
IAUM vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a -6.09% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 61.37% return.
IAUM
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- -16.73%
- YTD
- -6.09%
- 1Y
- 23.04%
- 3Y*
- 27.63%
- 5Y*
- 17.35%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.70%
FLKR
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -15.74%
- 6M
- 29.07%
- YTD
- 61.37%
- 1Y
- 117.49%
- 3Y*
- 35.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.49M | $47.84M | $51.57M | |
| $77.48M | $77.88M | $93.44M |
IAUM vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | -6.09% | 64.27% | 27.04% | 13.12% | -0.49% | 3.87% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 61.37% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -15.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUM and FLKR is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUM vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
IAUM
FLKR
IAUM vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAUM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.36 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 3.46 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | 12.27 | -10.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAUM vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -26.31%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.31% | -50.06% | +23.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.31% | -34.17% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.31% | -34.17% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.31% | -47.97% | +21.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.95% | -28.42% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -21.96% | +16.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.14% | 9.61% | +2.53% |
Volatility
IAUM vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) is 6.29%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.39%. This indicates that IAUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 21.39% | -15.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.21% | 50.33% | -27.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.81% | 53.42% | -25.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 32.16% | -13.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 29.79% | -11.60% |
IAUM vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IAUM and FLKR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IAUM vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.86% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAUM and FLKR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to IAUM (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -26.31% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, IAUM leads with 17.35% vs 14.07% for FLKR. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, IAUM has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAUM and FLKR have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.
IAUM is categorized as Gold, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAUM and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer