PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAUM vs. IAUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IAUM vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAUM achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly higher than IAUI's -3.56% return.


IAUM

1D
-0.62%
1M
-7.06%
YTD
-2.86%
6M
-5.65%
1Y
24.40%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
10Y*

IAUI

1D
-0.37%
1M
-6.04%
YTD
-3.56%
6M
-5.45%
1Y
15.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IAUM vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
-2.86%27.76%
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
-3.56%20.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IAUM and IAUI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.97

The correlation between IAUM and IAUI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IAUM vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUI
IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAUM vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IAUMIAUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

0.77

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

2.32

+0.42

IAUM vs. IAUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAUM Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the IAUI Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAUM and IAUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IAUM vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAUM drawdown since its inception was -24.37%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -20.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUM and IAUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IAUMIAUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.37%

-20.43%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.37%

-20.43%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.36%

-18.21%

-4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-4.07%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.94%

6.75%

+2.19%

Volatility

IAUM vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) at 7.56%. This indicates that IAUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IAUMIAUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.99%

7.56%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.04%

19.70%

+4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.25%

21.34%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.09%

20.98%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

20.98%

-2.89%

IAUM vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAUM has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IAUM vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison

IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.48%.


PositionTTM2025
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
14.48%6.88%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IAUM and IAUI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IAUM has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to IAUI (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUM dropped -24.37% vs IAUI's -20.43%.

On 1-year performance, IAUM leads with 24.40% vs 15.59% for IAUI. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IAUI has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 24.40% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 14.48%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.

IAUM is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IAUM and 0.78% for IAUI.

IAUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IAUM and IAUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer