PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAT vs. KBWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IAT vs. KBWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IAT vs. KBWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
-1.89%13.05%24.36%-8.53%-20.61%38.89%-7.60%31.38%-17.45%10.42%
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
-5.53%32.05%36.73%-1.18%-21.68%37.72%-10.46%35.90%-18.30%18.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly higher than KBWB's -5.53% return. Over the past 10 years, IAT has underperformed KBWB with an annualized return of 8.31%, while KBWB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


IAT

1D
3.16%
1M
-3.69%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
4.08%
1Y
19.12%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
8.31%

KBWB

1D
3.56%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
-5.53%
6M
2.34%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
27.16%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IAT vs. KBWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IAT vs. KBWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAT
IAT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

KBWB
KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAT vs. KBWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IATKBWBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

1.12

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.53

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.88

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.13

5.58

-2.45

IAT vs. KBWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the KBWB Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAT and KBWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IATKBWBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.12

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.30

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.41

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.47

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between IAT and KBWB is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IAT vs. KBWB - Dividend Comparison

IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than KBWB's 2.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
3.01%2.94%2.95%3.56%3.12%1.88%2.87%2.49%2.48%1.55%1.52%1.78%
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
2.27%2.04%2.46%3.20%3.05%2.13%2.62%2.38%2.54%1.35%1.53%1.53%

Drawdowns

IAT vs. KBWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than KBWB's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and KBWB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IATKBWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.22%

-50.27%

-26.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-16.38%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.55%

-49.31%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.55%

-50.27%

-5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.87%

-12.21%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-11.82%

-15.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

5.51%

+1.11%

Volatility

IAT vs. KBWB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) is 5.92%, while Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that IAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IATKBWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

6.61%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.94%

15.99%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.33%

26.00%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.09%

26.65%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.80%

29.25%

+1.55%