PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IAT vs. MTB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IAT vs. MTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
28.50%
41.70%
IAT
MTB

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a 33.11% return, which is significantly lower than MTB's 60.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IAT has underperformed MTB with an annualized return of 7.52%, while MTB has yielded a comparatively higher 8.52% annualized return.


IAT

YTD

33.11%

1M

8.23%

6M

28.50%

1Y

54.72%

5Y (annualized)

5.33%

10Y (annualized)

7.52%

MTB

YTD

60.04%

1M

8.18%

6M

41.70%

1Y

74.60%

5Y (annualized)

9.17%

10Y (annualized)

8.52%

Key characteristics


IATMTB
Sharpe Ratio2.082.62
Sortino Ratio3.073.65
Omega Ratio1.371.45
Calmar Ratio1.202.33
Martin Ratio12.6718.13
Ulcer Index4.31%4.13%
Daily Std Dev26.29%28.54%
Max Drawdown-77.23%-73.50%
Current Drawdown-13.82%-1.32%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between IAT and MTB is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IAT vs. MTB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IAT, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.082.62
The chart of Sortino ratio for IAT, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.073.65
The chart of Omega ratio for IAT, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.371.45
The chart of Calmar ratio for IAT, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.202.33
The chart of Martin ratio for IAT, currently valued at 12.67, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.6718.13
IAT
MTB

The current IAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the MTB Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAT and MTB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.08
2.62
IAT
MTB

Dividends

IAT vs. MTB - Dividend Comparison

IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than MTB's 2.48% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IAT
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF
2.89%3.56%3.12%1.88%2.87%2.49%2.48%1.56%1.52%1.78%1.68%1.56%
MTB
M&T Bank Corporation
2.48%3.79%3.31%2.93%3.46%2.42%2.48%1.75%1.79%2.31%2.23%2.41%

Drawdowns

IAT vs. MTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.23%, which is greater than MTB's maximum drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and MTB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-13.82%
-1.32%
IAT
MTB

Volatility

IAT vs. MTB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) is 12.21%, while M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) has a volatility of 13.16%. This indicates that IAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.21%
13.16%
IAT
MTB