IAT vs. MTB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB).
IAT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006.
Performance
IAT vs. MTB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IAT vs. MTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | -1.89% | 13.05% | 24.36% | -8.53% | -20.61% | 38.89% | -7.60% | 31.38% | -17.45% | 10.42% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 3.31% | 10.89% | 41.66% | -1.68% | -2.94% | 24.28% | -22.16% | 21.65% | -14.58% | 11.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than MTB's 3.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IAT has underperformed MTB with an annualized return of 8.31%, while MTB has yielded a comparatively higher 9.39% annualized return.
IAT
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -1.89%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
MTB
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 19.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAT vs. MTB — Risk / Return Rank
IAT
MTB
IAT vs. MTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and M&T Bank Corporation (MTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IAT | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 0.73 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.12 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.15 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 1.27 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.13 | 3.24 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IAT | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.73 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.32 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.29 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.40 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between IAT and MTB is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IAT vs. MTB - Dividend Comparison
IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than MTB's 2.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 3.01% | 2.94% | 2.95% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 1.88% | 2.87% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.78% |
MTB M&T Bank Corporation | 2.83% | 3.24% | 2.85% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.93% | 3.46% | 2.42% | 2.48% | 1.75% | 1.79% | 2.31% |
Drawdowns
IAT vs. MTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than MTB's maximum drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and MTB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAT | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.22% | -73.50% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -16.98% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.55% | -40.71% | -14.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.55% | -52.97% | -2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.87% | -12.54% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -12.43% | -14.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 6.64% | -0.02% |
Volatility
IAT vs. MTB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) is 5.92%, while M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that IAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IAT | MTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 6.73% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.94% | 16.46% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.33% | 26.27% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.09% | 30.46% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.80% | 32.85% | -2.05% |