IAT vs. KRE
IAT (iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF) and KRE (SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IAT tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index while KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAT returned 9.76%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for KRE. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. IAT charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KRE.
Performance
IAT vs. KRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly lower than KRE's 18.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IAT having a 9.76% annualized return and KRE not far behind at 9.54%.
IAT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 33.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.78%
KRE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 11.83%
- YTD
- 18.73%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.75M | $9.87M | $9.53M | |
| $961.35M | $999.45M | $1.05B |
IAT vs. KRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 16.55% | 13.05% | 24.36% | -8.53% | -20.61% | 38.89% | -7.60% | 31.38% | -17.45% | 10.42% |
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 18.73% | 10.21% | 18.58% | -7.61% | -15.08% | 39.29% | -7.43% | 27.44% | -18.81% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAT and KRE is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IAT and KRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IAT vs. KRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAT
KRE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IAT
KRE
Basic Materials
IAT
-
KRE
-
Communication Services
IAT
-
KRE
-
Consumer Cyclical
IAT
-
KRE
-
Consumer Defensive
IAT
-
KRE
-
Energy
IAT
-
KRE
-
Healthcare
IAT
-
KRE
-
Industrials
IAT
-
KRE
-
Real Estate
IAT
-
KRE
-
Technology
IAT
-
KRE
-
Utilities
IAT
-
KRE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAT vs. KRE — Risk / Return Rank
IAT
KRE
IAT vs. KRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAT | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.00 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 5.30 | -0.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAT vs. KRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than KRE's maximum drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and KRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAT | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.22% | -68.54% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -14.95% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | -28.20% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.55% | -52.69% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.55% | -54.92% | -0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -2.39% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -21.74% | -5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.77% | 5.63% | +1.14% |
Volatility
IAT vs. KRE - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) have volatilities of 5.49% and 5.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAT | KRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 5.56% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.01% | 15.30% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 22.91% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.76% | 29.63% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 31.76% | -1.09% |
IAT vs. KRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than KRE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAT vs. KRE - Dividend Comparison
IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than KRE's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 2.54% | 2.94% | 2.95% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 1.88% | 2.87% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.78% |
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 2.10% | 2.45% | 2.59% | 2.99% | 2.51% | 1.97% | 2.78% | 2.21% | 2.48% | 1.40% | 1.40% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, IAT and KRE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
KRE has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to IAT (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAT dropped -77.22% vs KRE's -68.54%.
On 10-year performance, IAT leads with 9.76% vs 9.54% for KRE. On fees, KRE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAT has performed better with a 9.76% return vs 9.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KRE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IAT.
IAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.10% for KRE.
IAT tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index, while KRE tracks S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IAT and 0.35% for KRE.
IAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAT and KRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer