PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAK vs. GSIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IAK vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IAK vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
-4.32%9.50%28.25%2.01%
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
-3.15%61.67%32.86%2.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAK achieves a -4.32% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's -3.15% return.


IAK

1D
0.63%
1M
-4.62%
YTD
-4.32%
6M
-2.34%
1Y
-4.39%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
12.01%

GSIB

1D
4.01%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
7.71%
1Y
36.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IAK vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IAK vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAK
IAK Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAK Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAK Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIB
GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAK vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAKGSIBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.24

1.79

-2.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

2.39

-2.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.34

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

2.51

-2.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.69

8.62

-9.32

IAK vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAK Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAK and GSIB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAKGSIBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

1.79

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

2.15

-1.89

Correlation

The correlation between IAK and GSIB is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IAK vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than GSIB's 1.97% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
2.75%1.69%1.49%1.44%1.69%2.26%2.07%1.84%2.33%1.62%1.68%1.62%
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
1.97%1.91%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IAK vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAK drawdown since its inception was -77.38%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAK and GSIB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IAKGSIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.38%

-17.71%

-59.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-14.59%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-9.87%

+4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-2.06%

-14.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

4.25%

+0.44%

Volatility

IAK vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) is 4.07%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that IAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IAKGSIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

7.69%

-3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

13.05%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

20.79%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

18.39%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.89%

18.39%

+2.50%