PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYUP vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYUP vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYUP achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.12% return.


HYUP

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.12%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*

DBAW

1D
-0.51%
1M
6.28%
YTD
16.12%
6M
18.39%
1Y
36.60%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYUP vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
1.63%8.83%10.30%14.56%-13.30%5.13%5.73%16.54%-3.90%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.12%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between HYUP and DBAW is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018

0.60

The correlation between HYUP and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYUP vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYUP
HYUP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HYUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYUP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HYUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYUP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYUP vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYUPDBAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.55

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

4.09

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

16.97

-6.51

HYUP vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYUP Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYUP and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYUPDBAWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.86

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.83

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.63

-0.11

Drawdowns

HYUP vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYUP drawdown since its inception was -24.79%, smaller than the maximum DBAW drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYUP and DBAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYUPDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.79%

-31.44%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-9.00%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.03%

-14.11%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

-17.87%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.51%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-5.00%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

2.16%

-1.45%

Volatility

HYUP vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) is 1.35%, while Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that HYUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYUPDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

4.71%

-3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.35%

11.00%

-7.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

12.88%

-8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

13.74%

-5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.75%

15.28%

-5.53%

HYUP vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYUP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYUP vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

HYUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than DBAW's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.29%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
7.33%7.44%7.78%7.48%7.15%6.19%6.89%6.77%6.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYUP and DBAW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBAW has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to HYUP (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYUP dropped -24.79% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

On 5-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.32% vs 4.39% for HYUP. On fees, HYUP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HYUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.32% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYUP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DBAW.

HYUP has the higher dividend yield at 7.33%, compared with 3.29% for DBAW.

HYUP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while DBAW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. HYUP tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market High Beta Index, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYUP and 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYUP and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer