PortfoliosLab logo
HYUP vs. EIFAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HYUP and EIFAX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

HYUP vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HYUP:

1.78

EIFAX:

2.12

Sortino Ratio

HYUP:

2.55

EIFAX:

3.56

Omega Ratio

HYUP:

1.40

EIFAX:

1.78

Calmar Ratio

HYUP:

1.94

EIFAX:

1.87

Martin Ratio

HYUP:

9.62

EIFAX:

8.67

Ulcer Index

HYUP:

1.21%

EIFAX:

0.74%

Daily Std Dev

HYUP:

6.58%

EIFAX:

3.15%

Max Drawdown

HYUP:

-24.79%

EIFAX:

-38.15%

Current Drawdown

HYUP:

0.00%

EIFAX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYUP achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's 0.90% return.


HYUP

YTD

2.72%

1M

2.22%

6M

1.95%

1Y

11.64%

3Y*

7.24%

5Y*

6.26%

10Y*

N/A

EIFAX

YTD

0.90%

1M

1.23%

6M

1.50%

1Y

6.64%

3Y*

8.21%

5Y*

7.39%

10Y*

4.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HYUP vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYUP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HYUP vs. EIFAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYUP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HYUP is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HYUP is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HYUP is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HYUP is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HYUP is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HYUP is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EIFAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EIFAX is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EIFAX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HYUP vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HYUP Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the EIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYUP and EIFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HYUP vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison

HYUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, less than EIFAX's 8.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
7.78%7.78%7.48%7.15%6.19%6.89%6.78%6.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
8.63%8.91%9.33%5.92%4.03%4.52%5.58%5.10%4.46%5.03%5.29%4.79%

Drawdowns

HYUP vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYUP drawdown since its inception was -24.79%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -38.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYUP and EIFAX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HYUP vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) at 0.65%. This indicates that HYUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...