PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYUP vs. ASHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HYUP vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HYUP vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
-0.43%8.83%10.30%14.56%-13.30%5.13%5.73%16.54%-3.90%
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
4.66%39.48%2.68%-10.03%-24.78%17.66%28.22%24.53%-38.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYUP achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 4.66% return.


HYUP

1D
1.17%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
0.62%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*

ASHS

1D
0.31%
1M
-11.46%
YTD
4.66%
6M
7.27%
1Y
40.76%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
2.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HYUP vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYUP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HYUP vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYUP
HYUP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HYUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYUP Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYUP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHS
ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYUP vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYUPASHSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

1.70

-0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

2.16

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.85

-1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.89

10.16

-2.27

HYUP vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYUP Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the ASHS Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYUP and ASHS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYUPASHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.70

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.15

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.17

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between HYUP and ASHS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HYUP vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

HYUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYUP
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
7.37%7.44%7.78%7.48%7.15%6.19%6.89%6.77%6.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.69%0.65%1.90%0.76%0.43%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.34%

Drawdowns

HYUP vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYUP drawdown since its inception was -24.79%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYUP and ASHS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HYUPASHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.79%

-69.90%

+45.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.65%

-14.03%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

-47.81%

+29.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-39.59%

+37.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-48.78%

+45.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

3.93%

-2.97%

Volatility

HYUP vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) is 2.38%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that HYUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HYUPASHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

8.57%

-6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.24%

16.21%

-12.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.39%

24.04%

-17.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.25%

26.08%

-17.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.83%

25.64%

-15.81%