HYT vs. IWMI
HYT (BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund) and IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) are both funds - HYT is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by BlackRock, while IWMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYT returned -0.64% vs 35.91% for IWMI. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYT charges 2.83%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IWMI.
Performance
HYT vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYT achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than IWMI's 14.60% return.
HYT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- -3.27%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.45%
IWMI
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 13.67%
- 1Y
- 35.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYT vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HYT BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund | 2.04% | 0.06% | 5.59% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 14.60% | 14.97% | 6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYT and IWMI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYT vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank
HYT
IWMI
HYT vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund (HYT) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYT | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.42 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 4.29 | -4.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 17.85 | -18.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYT | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 2.43 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.08 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
HYT vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYT drawdown since its inception was -56.95%, which is greater than IWMI's maximum drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYT and IWMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYT | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.95% | -23.88% | -33.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.17% | -8.40% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.10% | 0.00% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.91% | -4.11% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 2.02% | +2.15% |
Volatility
HYT vs. IWMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund (HYT) is 2.69%, while NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that HYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYT | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 4.28% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 10.78% | -2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.98% | 14.85% | -4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 17.89% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 17.89% | -0.96% |
HYT vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYT has a 2.83% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYT vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison
HYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, less than IWMI's 13.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYT BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund | 10.78% | 10.50% | 9.53% | 9.91% | 9.80% | 7.58% | 8.18% | 7.92% | 9.20% | 7.68% | 8.23% | 10.18% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 13.38% | 14.05% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYT and IWMI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWMI has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to HYT (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYT dropped -56.95% vs IWMI's -23.88%.
IWMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYT and IWMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer