HYS vs. MFDX
HYS (PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF) and MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y), while MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYS returned 5.08%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for MFDX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYS charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MFDX.
Performance
HYS vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYS achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than MFDX's 9.73% return.
HYS
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
MFDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
HYS vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.33% | 8.80% | 8.42% | 11.38% | -5.42% | 4.77% | 3.27% | 10.22% | -1.05% | 0.85% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 9.73% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 19.88% | -14.88% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYS and MFDX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between HYS and MFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYS vs. MFDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYS
MFDX
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HYS
MFDX
Basic Materials
HYS
-
MFDX
Consumer Cyclical
HYS
-
MFDX
Consumer Defensive
HYS
-
MFDX
Energy
HYS
-
MFDX
Financial Services
HYS
-
MFDX
Healthcare
HYS
-
MFDX
Industrials
HYS
-
MFDX
Real Estate
HYS
-
MFDX
Technology
HYS
-
MFDX
Utilities
HYS
-
MFDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYS vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank
HYS
MFDX
HYS vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYS | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.04 | 1.70 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | 2.38 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.31 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 2.18 | +1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.35 | 8.66 | +6.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYS | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.70 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.66 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.54 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
HYS vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYS drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, smaller than the maximum MFDX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYS and MFDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYS | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.91% | -36.05% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.88% | -10.66% | +8.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.98% | -11.62% | +6.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.61% | -25.58% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.84% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -6.50% | +4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | 2.68% | -2.22% |
Volatility
HYS vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) is 1.23%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that HYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYS | MFDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 4.45% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 11.34% | -8.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 13.73% | -10.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.26% | 15.03% | -8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 16.41% | -9.57% |
HYS vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYS vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison
HYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than MFDX's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF | 7.36% | 7.20% | 7.43% | 6.44% | 5.01% | 3.74% | 4.52% | 4.98% | 4.64% | 5.01% | 5.13% | 5.22% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.79% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYS and MFDX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to HYS (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYS dropped -20.91% vs MFDX's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.92% vs 5.08% for HYS. On fees, MFDX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, HYS has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFDX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.
HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 2.79% for MFDX.
HYS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MFDX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. HYS tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y), while MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for HYS and 0.39% for MFDX.
HYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYS and MFDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer