PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYS vs. MFDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYS vs. MFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYS achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than MFDX's 9.73% return.


HYS

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.83%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
5.35%

MFDX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.31%
YTD
9.73%
6M
12.33%
1Y
23.13%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYS vs. MFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.33%8.80%8.42%11.38%-5.42%4.77%3.27%10.22%-1.05%0.85%
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
9.73%34.27%4.40%17.54%-10.27%11.07%6.90%19.88%-14.88%7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HYS and MFDX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.63

The correlation between HYS and MFDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYS vs. MFDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYS
MFDX

Communication Services

100.0%
7.0%

Basic Materials

-

10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.0%

Energy

-

6.8%

Financial Services

-

16.4%

Healthcare

-

6.0%

Industrials

-

19.9%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Technology

-

7.1%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Communication Services

HYS
100.0%
MFDX
7.0%

Basic Materials

HYS

-

MFDX
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HYS

-

MFDX
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

HYS

-

MFDX
8.0%

Energy

HYS

-

MFDX
6.8%

Financial Services

HYS

-

MFDX
16.4%

Healthcare

HYS

-

MFDX
6.0%

Industrials

HYS

-

MFDX
19.9%

Real Estate

HYS

-

MFDX
3.0%

Technology

HYS

-

MFDX
7.1%

Utilities

HYS

-

MFDX
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYS vs. MFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYS
HYS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MFDX
MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYS vs. MFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYSMFDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

1.70

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

2.38

+0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

2.18

+1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.35

8.66

+6.69

HYS vs. MFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the MFDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYS and MFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYSMFDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.70

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.66

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.54

+0.27

Drawdowns

HYS vs. MFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYS drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, smaller than the maximum MFDX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYS and MFDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSMFDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.91%

-36.05%

+15.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.88%

-10.66%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

-11.62%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.61%

-25.58%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.84%

+1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-6.50%

+4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

2.68%

-2.22%

Volatility

HYS vs. MFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) is 1.23%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that HYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSMFDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

4.45%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

11.34%

-8.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

13.73%

-10.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.26%

15.03%

-8.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.84%

16.41%

-9.57%

HYS vs. MFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than MFDX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYS vs. MFDX - Dividend Comparison

HYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than MFDX's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
7.36%7.20%7.43%6.44%5.01%3.74%4.52%4.98%4.64%5.01%5.13%5.22%
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
2.79%2.97%3.16%3.12%2.85%2.99%1.58%2.88%2.13%0.71%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYS and MFDX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to HYS (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYS dropped -20.91% vs MFDX's -36.05%.

On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.92% vs 5.08% for HYS. On fees, MFDX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, HYS has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFDX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.

HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 2.79% for MFDX.

HYS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MFDX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. HYS tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y), while MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for HYS and 0.39% for MFDX.

HYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYS and MFDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer