HYMC vs. SVR-C.TO
HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) is a stock, while SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 5 years, HYMC returned -4.20%/yr vs 17.03%/yr for SVR-C.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HYMC vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HYMC is traded in USD, while SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR-C.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly higher than SVR-C.TO's -17.45% return.
HYMC
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -29.20%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 647.60%
- 3Y*
- 99.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -21.81%
- YTD
- -17.45%
- 6M
- -22.77%
- 1Y
- 63.83%
- 3Y*
- 36.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
HYMC vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | -1.56% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | -24.03% | 4.59% | 3.35% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -17.45% | 144.05% | 20.41% | -0.28% | 3.15% | -12.98% | 47.38% | 13.97% | -7.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYMC and SVR-C.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, HYMC and SVR-C.TO have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYMC vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HYMC
SVR-C.TO
HYMC vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYMC | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.23 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.70 | 1.26 | +9.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.26 | 2.76 | +23.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYMC vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than SVR-C.TO's maximum drawdown of -67.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and SVR-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYMC | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.89% | -67.24% | -31.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.07% | -51.08% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.45% | -51.08% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.90% | -51.08% | -42.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.21% | -49.32% | -35.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -40.00% | -23.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.84% | 23.18% | +1.66% |
Volatility
HYMC vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a higher volatility of 26.56% compared to iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) at 15.47%. This indicates that HYMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYMC | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.56% | 15.47% | +11.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.12% | 56.85% | +29.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.45% | 59.24% | +59.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.82% | 36.71% | +116.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.79% | 32.53% | +90.26% |
Dividends
HYMC vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HYMC nor SVR-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HYMC and SVR-C.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HYMC and SVR-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer