PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMC vs. AII.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HYMC vs. AII.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYMC is traded in USD, while AII.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AII.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than AII.TO's 87.33% return.


HYMC

1D
0.09%
1M
-29.20%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
-0.34%
1Y
647.60%
3Y*
99.37%
5Y*
-4.20%
10Y*

AII.TO

1D
2.26%
1M
-16.76%
YTD
87.33%
6M
86.46%
1Y
124.10%
3Y*
189.68%
5Y*
67.01%
10Y*
46.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMC vs. AII.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
-1.56%975.57%-9.80%-53.96%-13.30%-92.18%-24.03%4.59%3.35%
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
87.33%826.55%55.36%-18.65%-28.15%39.13%56.08%-32.61%20.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMC and AII.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018

0.14

Over the past year, HYMC and AII.TO have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HYMC:

$2.10B

AII.TO:

CA$6.53B

EPS

HYMC:

-$1.44

AII.TO:

-CA$0.50

PB Ratio

HYMC:

9.38

AII.TO:

18.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

HYMC:

$0.00

AII.TO:

CA$50.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HYMC:

-$4.65M

AII.TO:

CA$14.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

HYMC:

-$69.17M

AII.TO:

-CA$120.84M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMC vs. AII.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

AII.TO
AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMC vs. AII.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYMCAII.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.25

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.70

2.26

+8.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.26

4.65

+21.61

HYMC vs. AII.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMC Sharpe Ratio is 5.52, which is higher than the AII.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMC and AII.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYMC vs. AII.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than AII.TO's maximum drawdown of -85.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and AII.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMCAII.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.89%

-85.01%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.07%

-55.32%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.45%

-55.32%

-8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.90%

-62.74%

-31.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.21%

-29.47%

-55.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-40.58%

-22.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.84%

26.78%

-1.94%

Volatility

HYMC vs. AII.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) is 26.56%, while Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a volatility of 31.27%. This indicates that HYMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AII.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMCAII.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.56%

31.27%

-4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

86.12%

67.66%

+18.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

118.45%

99.43%

+19.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.82%

75.37%

+77.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

122.79%

75.68%

+47.11%

Dividends

HYMC vs. AII.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYMC nor AII.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

HYMC vs. AII.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation and Almonty Industries Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
25.40M
(HYMC) Total Revenue
(AII.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. HYMC values in USD, AII.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMC and AII.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMC and AII.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer