HYDW vs. ASHS
HYDW (Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYDW is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index, while ASHS is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYDW returned 3.58%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for ASHS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYDW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.
Performance
HYDW vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDW achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 15.19% return.
HYDW
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- —
ASHS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 23.82%
- 1Y
- 55.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.24%
HYDW vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 1.04% | 8.47% | 5.42% | 9.84% | -7.86% | 2.77% | 5.51% | 11.44% | -1.08% |
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 15.19% | 39.48% | 2.68% | -10.03% | -24.78% | 17.66% | 28.22% | 24.53% | -38.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDW and ASHS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDW vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank
HYDW
ASHS
HYDW vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDW | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 4.00 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 13.23 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDW | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.49 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.15 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.19 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
HYDW vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDW drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDW and ASHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDW | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -69.90% | +52.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | -14.03% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.64% | -34.13% | +30.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.68% | -47.81% | +35.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -33.52% | +33.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -48.56% | +46.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 4.23% | -3.79% |
Volatility
HYDW vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) is 0.74%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that HYDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDW | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 7.31% | -6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | 16.95% | -14.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95% | 22.57% | -19.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 26.46% | -20.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.99% | 25.57% | -18.58% |
HYDW vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYDW vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison
HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 5.75% | 5.75% | 5.35% | 5.69% | 4.78% | 3.30% | 4.45% | 4.56% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDW and ASHS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASHS has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to HYDW (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDW dropped -17.75% vs ASHS's -69.90%.
On 5-year performance, ASHS leads with 3.99% vs 3.58% for HYDW. On fees, HYDW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HYDW has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ASHS has performed better with a 3.99% return vs 3.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYDW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.
HYDW has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.
HYDW is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ASHS is China Equities. HYDW tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYDW and 0.65% for ASHS.
ASHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYDW and ASHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer