HYDW vs. BKHY
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY).
HYDW and BKHY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HYDW is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2018. BKHY is a passively managed fund by BNY Mellon that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2020. Both HYDW and BKHY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HYDW vs. BKHY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HYDW vs. BKHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | -0.08% | 8.47% | 5.42% | 9.84% | -7.86% | 2.77% | 10.73% |
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF | 0.09% | 8.48% | 8.37% | 12.40% | -10.97% | 4.75% | 17.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDW achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than BKHY's 0.09% return.
HYDW
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- —
BKHY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.09%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HYDW vs. BKHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BKHY's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
HYDW vs. BKHY — Risk / Return Rank
HYDW
BKHY
HYDW vs. BKHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDW | BKHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 1.21 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 1.68 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 1.72 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 8.73 | +2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDW | BKHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.21 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.54 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.88 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDW and BKHY is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HYDW vs. BKHY - Dividend Comparison
HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, less than BKHY's 7.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 5.62% | 5.75% | 5.35% | 5.69% | 4.78% | 3.30% | 4.45% | 4.56% | 4.42% |
BKHY BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF | 7.72% | 7.33% | 7.34% | 8.67% | 6.59% | 6.78% | 4.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HYDW vs. BKHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDW drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than BKHY's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDW and BKHY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDW | BKHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -15.89% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | -3.12% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.68% | -15.89% | +3.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -1.03% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -3.05% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.83% | -0.27% |
Volatility
HYDW vs. BKHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) is 1.73%, while BNY Mellon High Yield Beta ETF (BKHY) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that HYDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HYDW | BKHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 2.30% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 2.87% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 5.79% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 7.56% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.05% | 7.44% | -0.39% |