PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYD vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYD vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYD achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -32.31% return.


HYD

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.18%
YTD
2.48%
6M
2.58%
1Y
7.59%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
-0.12%
10Y*
1.89%

HODL

1D
-1.06%
1M
-21.99%
YTD
-32.31%
6M
-32.14%
1Y
-45.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYD vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HYD
VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF
2.48%2.83%5.41%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-32.31%-6.42%91.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HYD and HODL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYD vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYD
HYD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYD vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYDHODLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.83

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

-0.86

+3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

-1.46

+9.64

HYD vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYD and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYD vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYD drawdown since its inception was -35.61%, smaller than the maximum HODL drawdown of -52.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYD and HODL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.61%

-52.83%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-52.83%

+49.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-52.83%

+51.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-16.90%

+12.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

30.84%

-29.91%

Volatility

HYD vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD) is 0.93%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that HYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

13.29%

-12.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.07%

34.55%

-31.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

44.21%

-40.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.46%

49.88%

-43.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

49.88%

-37.27%

HYD vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYD vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

HYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYD
VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF
4.24%4.29%4.29%4.13%3.96%3.50%4.01%4.08%4.43%4.29%4.58%4.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYD and HODL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HODL has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to HYD (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYD dropped -35.61% vs HODL's -52.83%.

On 1-year performance, HYD leads with 7.59% vs -45.11% for HODL. On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HYD has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYD has performed better with a 7.59% return vs -45.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYD.

HYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

HYD is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. HYD tracks Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Custom High Yield Composite Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYD and 0.25% for HODL.

HYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYD and HODL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer