PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYD vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYD vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYD achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, HYD has underperformed HYG with an annualized return of 1.99%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.97% annualized return.


HYD

1D
0.45%
1M
1.90%
YTD
2.52%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
1.99%

HYG

1D
0.35%
1M
0.65%
YTD
1.74%
6M
2.08%
1Y
6.32%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
4.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYD vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYD
VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF
2.52%2.83%4.94%6.52%-15.97%5.05%0.17%9.34%2.19%9.78%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.74%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HYD and HYG is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2009

0.19

Over the past year, HYD and HYG have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYD vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYD
HYD Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYD Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYD vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYDHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.86

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

12.54

-4.07

HYD vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYD and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYD vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYD drawdown since its inception was -35.61%, roughly equal to the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYD and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.61%

-34.25%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-2.34%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.23%

-4.56%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.72%

-15.79%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-22.03%

-13.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-0.04%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-3.23%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.53%

+0.40%

Volatility

HYD vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF (HYD) is 0.90%, while iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that HYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

1.27%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

3.12%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

3.89%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.46%

7.54%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.60%

8.29%

+4.31%

HYD vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYD vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

HYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than HYG's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYD
VanEck Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF
4.24%4.29%4.29%4.13%3.96%3.50%4.01%4.08%4.43%4.29%4.58%4.82%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.90%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYD and HYG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYG has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to HYD (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYD dropped -35.61% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 10-year performance, HYG leads with 4.97% vs 1.99% for HYD. On fees, HYD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYD has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYG has performed better with a 4.97% return vs 1.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 4.24% for HYD.

HYD is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. HYD tracks Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Custom High Yield Composite Index, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYD and 0.49% for HYG.

HYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYD and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer