HWM vs. CL
HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. HWM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, HWM returned 31.79%/yr vs 4.21%/yr for CL. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HWM vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWM achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than CL's 10.27% return. Over the past 10 years, HWM has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 31.79%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.
HWM
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -8.87%
- YTD
- 20.38%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 75.58%
- 5Y*
- 48.17%
- 10Y*
- 31.79%
CL
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.21%
HWM vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 20.38% | 87.95% | 102.71% | 37.84% | 24.16% | 11.67% | 21.03% | 83.54% | -37.43% | 48.40% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 10.27% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWM and CL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1977 | 0.21 |
The correlation between HWM and CL shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HWM:
$99.36B
CL:
$69.29B
HWM:
$4.31
CL:
$2.58
HWM:
57.22
CL:
33.37
HWM:
0.97
CL:
8.62
HWM:
11.57
CL:
3.35
HWM:
17.99
CL:
477.90
HWM:
$8.62B
CL:
$20.80B
HWM:
$2.81B
CL:
$12.49B
HWM:
$2.66B
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HWM vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
HWM
CL
HWM vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWM | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.00 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | -0.12 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | -0.20 | +7.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWM | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | -0.10 | +1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.51 | 0.17 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.21 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.42 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
HWM vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWM drawdown since its inception was -88.30%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWM and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWM | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.30% | -58.91% | -29.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -18.64% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -29.05% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -29.05% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.81% | -29.05% | -35.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.88% | -17.54% | +7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.01% | -11.24% | -19.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.58% | 11.29% | -5.71% |
Volatility
HWM vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) have volatilities of 7.62% and 7.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HWM | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 7.77% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.08% | 17.27% | +6.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.70% | 21.67% | +9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.04% | 18.77% | +13.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.78% | 19.74% | +20.04% |
Dividends
HWM vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
HWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than CL's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.43% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
Financials
HWM vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Howmet Aerospace Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HWM vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
HWM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 854.00M and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
HWM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 734.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
HWM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 580.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HWM and CL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to HWM (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWM dropped -88.30% vs CL's -58.91%.
HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HWM and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer