PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTL.TO achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than PLTE.TO's -22.82% return.


HUTL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
11.42%
6M
12.52%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*

PLTE.TO

1D
3.41%
1M
5.17%
YTD
-22.82%
6M
-22.26%
1Y
66.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTL.TO
HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTE.TO
PLTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUTL.TOPLTE.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

1.06

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

1.67

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.58

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.46

3.93

+7.53

HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTL.TO and PLTE.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUTL.TOPLTE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.06

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.12

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between HUTL.TO and PLTE.TO is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, less than PLTE.TO's 35.10% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
HUTL.TO
Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF
7.34%7.94%8.30%8.56%8.13%7.16%7.73%5.33%
PLTE.TO
Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF
35.10%23.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTL.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, smaller than the maximum PLTE.TO drawdown of -43.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTL.TO and PLTE.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HUTL.TOPLTE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.00%

-43.92%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-41.32%

+34.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-33.33%

+32.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-14.81%

+8.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

16.62%

-14.95%

Volatility

HUTL.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) is 3.63%, while Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) has a volatility of 13.86%. This indicates that HUTL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HUTL.TOPLTE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

13.86%

-10.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.70%

40.75%

-34.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

62.67%

-49.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

70.49%

-57.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

70.49%

-55.20%