HUTG vs. HOOG

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

HUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. HUTG is passively managed, while HOOG is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

HUTG vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HUTG

• 1D: -7.85%
• 1M: -30.20%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: -5.50%
• 1M: 41.33%
• 6M: -33.91%
• YTD: -32.04%
• 1Y: -32.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTG vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF	47.66%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-36.23%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTG and HOOG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.48

Return for Risk

HUTG vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 10
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 14
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTG vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUTG	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.24	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.60	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.07	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.38	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.56	—

Drawdowns

HUTG vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTG drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTG and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUTG	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.30%	-86.94%	+20.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-86.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.12%	-68.30%	+21.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.55%	-40.20%	+12.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	58.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUTG	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	37.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	104.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	212.66%	138.25%	+74.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	212.66%	144.40%	+68.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	212.66%	144.40%	+68.26%

HUTG vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HUTG and HOOG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

HUTG vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

HUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.10%.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	18.10%	12.30%
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUTG and HOOG in my portfolio?

HUTG and HOOG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUTG or HOOG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUTG or HOOG?

HUTG and HOOG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUTG or HOOG?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 18.10%, compared with 0.00% for HUTG.