HUTG vs. CIFG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. HUTG is passively managed, while CIFG is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

HUTG vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HUTG

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: 150.46%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFG

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 94.51%
• YTD: 92.34%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTG vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF	180.22%
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	30.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTG and CIFG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

HUTG vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUTG	CIFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.18	0.12	+6.06

Drawdowns

HUTG vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTG drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, smaller than the maximum CIFG drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTG and CIFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUTG	CIFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.30%	-71.71%	+5.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-0.35%	-2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.80%	-38.01%	+11.21%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUTG	CIFG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	220.40%	203.83%	+16.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	220.40%	203.83%	+16.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	220.40%	203.83%	+16.57%

HUTG vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HUTG and CIFG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

HUTG vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUTG nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUTG and CIFG in my portfolio?

HUTG and CIFG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUTG or CIFG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUTG or CIFG?

HUTG and CIFG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUTG or CIFG?

HUTG and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.