HUMN vs. XLK
HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. HUMN is actively managed, while XLK is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
HUMN vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 34.34% return.
HUMN
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 26.42%
- 6M
- 29.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 16.63%
- YTD
- 34.34%
- 6M
- 33.10%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 33.46%
- 5Y*
- 23.44%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
HUMN vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 26.42% | 19.36% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 34.34% | 15.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUMN and XLK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.67 |
HUMN vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HUMN
XLK
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
HUMN
XLK
Consumer Cyclical
HUMN
XLK
-
Technology
HUMN
XLK
Basic Materials
HUMN
XLK
-
Communication Services
HUMN
XLK
-
Financial Services
HUMN
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
HUMN
-
XLK
-
Energy
HUMN
-
XLK
Healthcare
HUMN
-
XLK
-
Real Estate
HUMN
-
XLK
-
Utilities
HUMN
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUMN vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
HUMN
XLK
HUMN vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUMN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.86 | 0.41 | +1.45 |
Drawdowns
HUMN vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUMN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.40% | -82.05% | +61.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -2.54% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -34.95% | +30.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility
HUMN vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUMN | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.66% | 20.86% | +8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.66% | 24.90% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.66% | 24.49% | +5.17% |
HUMN vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUMN vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than XLK's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 0.57% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUMN and XLK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.
HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.40% for XLK.
HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while XLK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for HUMN and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer