HUMN vs. SLV

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. HUMN is actively managed, while SLV is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.

Performance

HUMN vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 21.30% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -7.62% return.

HUMN

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 21.30%
• 6M: 24.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLV

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -14.31%
• YTD: -7.62%
• 6M: -2.33%
• 1Y: 81.88%
• 3Y*: 38.96%
• 5Y*: 20.04%
• 10Y*: 13.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	21.30%	20.70%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	-7.62%	95.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and SLV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 36
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUMN	SLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.67	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.75	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.68	—

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and SLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	SLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-76.28%	+55.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-45.40%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-45.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.94%	-43.65%	+36.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.60%	-44.65%	+40.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	21.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	SLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	59.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.73%	60.10%	-29.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.73%	36.50%	-5.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.73%	32.04%	-1.31%

HUMN vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.60%	0.72%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and SLV in my portfolio?

HUMN and SLV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or SLV?

On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or SLV?

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or SLV?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

What is the main difference between HUMN and SLV?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while SLV is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.50% for SLV.