HUMN vs. GSG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. HUMN is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

HUMN vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 40.46% return.

HUMN

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: 10.87%
• YTD: 26.42%
• 6M: 29.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSG

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: -5.32%
• YTD: 40.46%
• 6M: 38.18%
• 1Y: 49.68%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 15.39%
• 10Y*: 7.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	26.42%	19.36%
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	40.46%	4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and GSG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSG

GSG Risk / Return Rank: 71
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUMN	GSG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.86	-0.09	+1.95

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and GSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	GSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-89.62%	+69.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.46%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-57.59%	+54.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-63.71%	+59.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.62%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	GSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.66%	23.01%	+6.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.66%	22.61%	+7.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.66%	22.03%	+7.63%

HUMN vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HUMN and GSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

HUMN vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	0.00%	0.00%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.57%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUMN and GSG in my portfolio?

HUMN and GSG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUMN or GSG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUMN or GSG?

HUMN and GSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HUMN or GSG?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

What is the main difference between HUMN and GSG?

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares.