HUMN vs. FTEC

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).

HUMN and FTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUMN is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 25, 2025. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013.

Performance

HUMN vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HUMN vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	-3.82%	19.36%
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	-5.31%	15.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's -5.31% return.

HUMN

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -7.53%
• YTD: -3.82%
• 6M: -5.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTEC

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: -5.31%
• 6M: -5.60%
• 1Y: 30.19%
• 3Y*: 23.87%
• 5Y*: 15.25%
• 10Y*: 21.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.

HUMN

Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF

FTEC

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEC

FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 59
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUMN	FTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.86	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and FTEC is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HUMN vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than FTEC's 0.45% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.75%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF	0.45%	0.43%	0.49%	0.77%	0.93%	0.63%	0.83%	1.03%	1.20%	0.96%	1.25%	1.27%

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and FTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUMN	FTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.40%	-34.95%	+14.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.93%	-10.77%	-5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-5.61%	+1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HUMN	FTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.96%	27.53%	-0.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.96%	25.10%	+1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.96%	24.57%	+2.39%