PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HUMN vs. AIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HUMN vs. AIA

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) and AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill, while AIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50. HUMN is actively managed, while AIA is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for AIA.

Performance

HUMN vs. AIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMN achieves a 18.42% return, which is significantly lower than AIA's 44.56% return.

HUMN

1D
1.32%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
18.42%
6M
21.07%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

AIA

1D
0.54%
1M
6.70%
YTD
44.56%
6M
50.54%
1Y
83.79%
3Y*
34.57%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMN vs. AIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
HUMN
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF		18.42%20.70%
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF		44.56%21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMN and AIA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.78

HUMN vs. AIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HUMN
AIA

Industrials

34.9%
2.0%

Technology

25.7%
63.8%

Consumer Cyclical

19.6%
8.6%

Basic Materials

7.3%

-

Communication Services

2.1%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

-1.0%
16.4%

Industrials

HUMN
34.9%
AIA
2.0%

Technology

HUMN
25.7%
AIA
63.8%

Consumer Cyclical

HUMN
19.6%
AIA
8.6%

Basic Materials

HUMN
7.3%
AIA

-

Communication Services

HUMN
2.1%
AIA
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

HUMN

-

AIA

-

Energy

HUMN

-

AIA
0.6%

Healthcare

HUMN

-

AIA
0.8%

Real Estate

HUMN

-

AIA
0.5%

Utilities

HUMN

-

AIA

-

Financial Services

HUMN
-1.0%
AIA
16.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF

iShares Asia 50 ETF

Often compared with HUMN:
HUMN vs. KOIDHUMN vs. BOTTHUMN vs. BOTZHUMN vs. ROBOHUMN vs. IBOTHUMN vs. ROBTHUMN vs. ARKQ
Often compared with AIA:
AIA vs. EEMAAIA vs. SPYAIA vs. VPLAIA vs. IOOAIA vs. GMFAIA vs. VWOAIA vs. IEMG

Return for Risk

HUMN vs. AIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HUMN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIA
AIA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMN vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HUMNAIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

2.89

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

3.41

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.49

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

5.70

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

19.76

—

HUMN vs. AIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUMN vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMN drawdown since its inception was -20.40%, smaller than the maximum AIA drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMN and AIA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HUMNAIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.40%

-60.89%

+40.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-14.15%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-21.64%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-50.11%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-54.64%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.15%

-6.44%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-16.66%

+12.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

4.08%

—

Volatility

HUMN vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HUMNAIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

14.34%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

24.49%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.67%

27.93%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.67%

25.96%

+4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.67%

23.78%

+6.89%

HUMN vs. AIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AIA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUMN vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison

HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than AIA's 1.73% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF		1.73%2.50%2.78%2.07%2.59%1.54%1.11%2.24%2.49%1.45%2.29%2.88%
HUMN
Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF		0.61%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

HUMN and AIA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.

AIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.61% for HUMN.

HUMN is categorized as Robotics, while AIA is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUMN and 0.50% for AIA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUMN and AIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer