AIA vs. GMF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF).
AIA and GMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AIA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia 50. It was launched on Nov 13, 2007. GMF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. Both AIA and GMF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AIA or GMF.
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and GMF is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AIA vs. GMF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AIA:
0.77
GMF:
0.69
AIA:
1.22
GMF:
1.08
AIA:
1.16
GMF:
1.14
AIA:
0.56
GMF:
0.59
AIA:
2.92
GMF:
1.85
AIA:
7.15%
GMF:
7.50%
AIA:
27.23%
GMF:
20.15%
AIA:
-60.89%
GMF:
-67.18%
AIA:
-25.40%
GMF:
-13.72%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly higher than GMF's -1.22% return. Over the past 10 years, AIA has outperformed GMF with an annualized return of 4.63%, while GMF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.15% annualized return.
AIA
2.42%
-7.29%
-2.35%
17.70%
5.75%
4.63%
GMF
-1.22%
-3.73%
-5.07%
12.35%
7.49%
4.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AIA vs. GMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GMF's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AIA vs. GMF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AIA
GMF
AIA vs. GMF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AIA vs. GMF - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than GMF's 1.94% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 2.72% | 2.78% | 2.62% | 2.59% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.50% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% | 2.24% |
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | 1.94% | 1.92% | 2.75% | 2.54% | 2.71% | 1.32% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 3.76% | 1.55% |
Drawdowns
AIA vs. GMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, smaller than the maximum GMF drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and GMF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AIA vs. GMF - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 14.70% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) at 11.41%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.