HUC.TO vs. PHYS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HUC.TO (Global X Crude Oil ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Light Sweet Crude Oil Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while PHYS (Sprott Physical Gold Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, HUC.TO returned 8.61%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for PHYS. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

HUC.TO vs. PHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Crude Oil ETF (HUC.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HUC.TO is traded in CAD, while PHYS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PHYS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUC.TO achieves a 45.00% return, which is significantly higher than PHYS's 2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HUC.TO has underperformed PHYS with an annualized return of 8.61%, while PHYS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.

HUC.TO

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: 45.00%
• 6M: 41.59%
• 1Y: 40.27%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 13.32%
• 10Y*: 8.61%

PHYS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: 2.93%
• 6M: 3.83%
• 1Y: 32.57%
• 3Y*: 31.14%
• 5Y*: 20.77%
• 10Y*: 13.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUC.TO vs. PHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HUC.TO Global X Crude Oil ETF	45.00%	-13.63%	7.23%	-2.89%	26.25%	57.81%	-21.10%	19.75%	-11.68%	-3.47%
PHYS Sprott Physical Gold Trust	2.93%	56.43%	37.29%	10.49%	5.19%	-5.70%	21.80%	12.33%	5.61%	5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between HUC.TO and PHYS is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2010	-0.05

The correlation between HUC.TO and PHYS shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (10 years) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HUC.TO vs. PHYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUC.TO

HUC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
HUC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
HUC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
HUC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
HUC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
HUC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

PHYS

PHYS Risk / Return Rank: 71
PHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 71
PHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUC.TO vs. PHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Crude Oil ETF (HUC.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HUC.TO	PHYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.25	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	1.62	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	1.81	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.94	4.41	+0.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUC.TO vs. PHYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUC.TO and PHYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUC.TO	PHYS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	1.25	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	1.22	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.85	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.55	-0.42

Drawdowns

HUC.TO vs. PHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUC.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.99%, which is greater than PHYS's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUC.TO and PHYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUC.TO	PHYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.99%	-36.76%	-40.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.20%	-18.09%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.83%	-18.09%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.83%	-18.09%	-12.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.56%	-23.34%	-38.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-16.20%	+13.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.61%	-13.90%	-20.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.17%	7.40%	+0.77%

Volatility

HUC.TO vs. PHYS - Volatility Comparison

Global X Crude Oil ETF (HUC.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) at 5.44%. This indicates that HUC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUC.TO	PHYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.26%	5.44%	+5.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.17%	22.46%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.36%	26.16%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.85%	17.08%	+10.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.04%	15.69%	+13.35%

Dividends

HUC.TO vs. PHYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither HUC.TO nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUC.TO and PHYS in my portfolio?

HUC.TO and PHYS have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.