HUC.TO vs. HACK
HUC.TO (Global X Crude Oil ETF) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUC.TO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Solactive Light Sweet Crude Oil Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while HACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HUC.TO returned 6.81%/yr vs 16.83%/yr for HACK. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUC.TO charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.
Performance
HUC.TO vs. HACK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HUC.TO is traded in CAD, while HACK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HACK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUC.TO achieves a 22.63% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 23.96% return. Over the past 10 years, HUC.TO has underperformed HACK with an annualized return of 6.81%, while HACK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return.
HUC.TO
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- 22.63%
- 6M
- 20.63%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
HACK
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 23.96%
- 6M
- 21.78%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
HUC.TO vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUC.TO Global X Crude Oil ETF | 22.63% | -13.63% | 7.23% | -2.89% | 26.25% | 57.81% | -21.10% | 19.75% | -11.68% | -3.47% |
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | 23.96% | 3.04% | 33.94% | 34.17% | -23.60% | 6.97% | 38.15% | 18.30% | 15.57% | 11.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUC.TO and HACK is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2014 | 0.13 |
The correlation between HUC.TO and HACK shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUC.TO vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank
HUC.TO
HACK
HUC.TO vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Crude Oil ETF (HUC.TO) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUC.TO | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 1.85 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUC.TO vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUC.TO drawdown since its inception was -88.50%, which is greater than HACK's maximum drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUC.TO and HACK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUC.TO | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.50% | -35.67% | -52.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.79% | -22.51% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.83% | -23.10% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -33.75% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.56% | -33.75% | -27.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.48% | -6.43% | -52.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.73% | -9.92% | -42.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 9.61% | -2.79% |
Volatility
HUC.TO vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Crude Oil ETF (HUC.TO) is 8.04%, while Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that HUC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUC.TO | HACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 11.35% | -3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.20% | 22.09% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.35% | 26.28% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.05% | 24.85% | +3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.02% | 24.03% | +4.99% |
HUC.TO vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUC.TO has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUC.TO vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison
HUC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK Amplify Cybersecurity ETF | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.14% | 0.20% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% |
HUC.TO Global X Crude Oil ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUC.TO and HACK have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HACK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HACK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for HUC.TO.
HUC.TO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while HACK is Technology Equities. HUC.TO tracks Solactive Light Sweet Crude Oil Winter MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for HUC.TO and 0.60% for HACK.
Find the right allocation for HUC.TO and HACK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer