HTUS vs. VOO
HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTUS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. HTUS is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HTUS returned 12.20%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTUS charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
HTUS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, HTUS has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.20%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
HTUS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
HTUS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 8.95% | 16.57% | 25.02% | 30.11% | -13.00% | 24.29% | 13.21% | 20.27% | -10.04% | 14.19% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and VOO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2015 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, HTUS and VOO have become more correlated (0.95) than their long-term average of 0.75, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
VOO
HTUS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTUS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.67 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.82 | 11.96 | +1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -33.99% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -8.90% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | -18.69% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | -24.52% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | -33.99% | -13.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -3.14% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -3.68% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.99% | -0.24% |
Volatility
HTUS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 4.02%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 4.83% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 9.82% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 12.46% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 16.91% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 18.02% | +3.47% |
HTUS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTUS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.91% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, HTUS and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to HTUS (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTUS dropped -47.50% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 12.20% for HTUS. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
HTUS is categorized as Long-Short, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 0.03% for VOO.
HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTUS and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer