HTUS vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. HTUS is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTUS returned 15.60%/yr vs -4.30%/yr for SENT. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTUS charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

HTUS vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HTUS

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 11.94%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 30.10%
• 3Y*: 22.37%
• 5Y*: 15.60%
• 10Y*: 12.59%

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTUS vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF	11.94%	16.57%	25.02%	30.11%	-13.00%	24.01%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	8.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HTUS and SENT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	0.43

The correlation between HTUS and SENT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HTUS vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HTUS	SENT
Technology	35.6%	26.2%
Financial Services	11.8%	6.1%
Communication Services	11.2%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	24.8%
Industrials	8.3%	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.1%
Energy	3.5%	10.3%
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	3.0%

Return for Risk

HTUS vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTUS

HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 81
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTUS vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTUS	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTUS	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	-0.34	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	-0.25	+0.83

Drawdowns

HTUS vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than SENT's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTUS	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.50%	-30.34%	-17.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	0.00%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.41%	-15.83%	-8.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.41%	-30.34%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-27.23%	+27.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.06%	-20.89%	+16.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	0.00%	+1.68%

Volatility

HTUS vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that HTUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTUS	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	0.00%	+2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	0.00%	+9.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.49%	0.00%	+11.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.03%	12.67%	+6.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.45%	13.32%	+8.13%

HTUS vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

HTUS vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF	10.62%	11.89%	17.80%	1.18%	5.63%	7.20%	3.77%	0.92%	8.69%	8.29%	3.02%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTUS and SENT in my portfolio?

HTUS and SENT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HTUS or SENT?

HTUS has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTUS dropped -47.50% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, HTUS or SENT?

On 5-year performance, HTUS leads with 15.60% vs -4.30% for SENT. On fees, HTUS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HTUS or SENT?

Over the 5-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 15.60% return vs -4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTUS or SENT?

HTUS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HTUS or SENT?

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.62%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between HTUS and SENT?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 1.01% for SENT.