HTUS vs. ATTR
HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) and ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HTUS charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ATTR.
Performance
HTUS vs. ATTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly higher than ATTR's 4.25% return.
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.52%
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS vs. ATTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 11.33% | 1.52% |
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and ATTR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. ATTR — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
ATTR
HTUS vs. ATTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTUS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTUS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 2.81 | -2.24 |
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. ATTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than ATTR's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and ATTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -1.76% | -45.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.19% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -0.18% | -3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | — | — |
Volatility
HTUS vs. ATTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 2.97% | +8.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 2.97% | +16.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 2.97% | +18.48% |
HTUS vs. ATTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ATTR's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTUS vs. ATTR - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, while ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.68% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTUS and ATTR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Arin Risk Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 0.63% for ATTR.
Find the right allocation for HTUS and ATTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer