HTRB vs. HQGO
HTRB (Hartford Total Return Bond ETF) and HQGO (Hartford US Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTRB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Hartford, while HQGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford US Quality Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. HTRB is actively managed, while HQGO is passively managed. Over the past year, HTRB returned 5.14% vs 25.85% for HQGO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTRB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for HQGO.
Performance
HTRB vs. HQGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTRB achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than HQGO's 10.30% return.
HTRB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- —
HQGO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTRB vs. HQGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | 0.35% | 7.38% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | 10.30% | 15.15% | 25.09% | 6.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTRB and HQGO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.23 |
HTRB vs. HQGO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HTRB
HQGO
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
HTRB
HQGO
Basic Materials
HTRB
-
HQGO
Communication Services
HTRB
-
HQGO
Consumer Cyclical
HTRB
-
HQGO
Consumer Defensive
HTRB
-
HQGO
Financial Services
HTRB
-
HQGO
Healthcare
HTRB
-
HQGO
Industrials
HTRB
-
HQGO
Real Estate
HTRB
-
HQGO
Technology
HTRB
-
HQGO
Utilities
HTRB
-
HQGO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTRB vs. HQGO — Risk / Return Rank
HTRB
HQGO
HTRB vs. HQGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTRB | HQGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.50 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 10.30 | -4.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTRB | HQGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.95 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.38 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
HTRB vs. HQGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTRB drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, smaller than the maximum HQGO drawdown of -20.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTRB and HQGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTRB | HQGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.48% | -20.85% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -10.40% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.72% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -2.52% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 2.52% | -1.57% |
Volatility
HTRB vs. HQGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) is 1.28%, while Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) has a volatility of 2.59%. This indicates that HTRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HQGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTRB | HQGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 2.59% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 9.94% | -7.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 13.35% | -9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 16.97% | -10.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.57% | 16.97% | -11.40% |
HTRB vs. HQGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTRB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HQGO's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTRB vs. HQGO - Dividend Comparison
HTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than HQGO's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HQGO Hartford US Quality Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | 4.63% | 4.66% | 4.45% | 3.87% | 3.08% | 4.22% | 4.79% | 6.30% | 2.37% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTRB and HQGO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HQGO has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to HTRB (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTRB dropped -19.48% vs HQGO's -20.85%.
On 1-year performance, HQGO leads with 25.85% vs 5.14% for HTRB. On fees, HTRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HTRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HQGO has performed better with a 25.85% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for HQGO.
HTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 0.46% for HQGO.
HTRB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while HQGO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HTRB and 0.34% for HQGO.
HQGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTRB and HQGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer