HTRB vs. GTO
HTRB (Hartford Total Return Bond ETF) and GTO (Invesco Total Return Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HTRB returned 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for GTO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTRB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GTO.
Performance
HTRB vs. GTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTRB achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than GTO's 0.85% return.
HTRB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- —
GTO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
HTRB vs. GTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | 0.53% | 7.38% | 2.35% | 7.15% | -14.36% | -0.80% | 8.87% | 10.39% | -0.88% | 0.97% |
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 0.85% | 7.17% | 2.63% | 5.95% | -14.77% | -0.38% | 10.86% | 11.65% | -0.26% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTRB and GTO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HTRB and GTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTRB vs. GTO — Risk / Return Rank
HTRB
GTO
HTRB vs. GTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) and Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTRB | GTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.30 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.02 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 6.14 | -1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTRB vs. GTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTRB drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, smaller than the maximum GTO drawdown of -20.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTRB and GTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTRB | GTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.48% | -20.61% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.73% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.52% | -5.98% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | -20.61% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -1.46% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -4.78% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.90% | +0.10% |
Volatility
HTRB vs. GTO - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) at 0.98%. This indicates that HTRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTRB | GTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 0.98% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.80% | 2.58% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78% | 3.40% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.12% | 5.68% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.56% | 5.58% | -0.02% |
HTRB vs. GTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTRB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GTO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTRB vs. GTO - Dividend Comparison
HTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than GTO's 4.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 4.81% | 4.70% | 4.42% | 4.05% | 3.47% | 1.93% | 4.04% | 2.97% | 5.25% | 2.81% | 2.57% |
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | 4.62% | 4.66% | 4.45% | 3.87% | 3.08% | 4.22% | 4.79% | 6.30% | 2.37% | 0.96% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, HTRB and GTO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HTRB has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to GTO (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTRB dropped -19.48% vs GTO's -20.61%.
On 5-year performance, HTRB leads with 0.35% vs 0.04% for GTO. On fees, HTRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTRB has performed better with a 0.35% return vs 0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GTO.
GTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 4.62% for HTRB.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HTRB and 0.35% for GTO.
GTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTRB and GTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer