PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTRB vs. NFLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTRB vs. NFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTRB achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than NFLT's 1.48% return.


HTRB

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.39%
6M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.63%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.04%

NFLT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.73%
YTD
1.48%
1Y
4.92%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
3.83%
ALL TIME*
4.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.66M$5.95M$7.92M
$2.33M$1.94M$2.09M

HTRB vs. NFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HTRB
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
-0.63%7.38%2.35%7.15%-14.36%-0.80%8.87%10.39%-0.88%0.97%
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
1.48%8.77%6.05%9.16%-9.49%1.18%8.02%10.13%-2.68%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HTRB and NFLT is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.50

The correlation between HTRB and NFLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTRB vs. NFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HTRB
HTRB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
HTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLT
NFLT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HTRB vs. NFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTRBNFLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

2.22

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

9.06

-6.35

HTRB vs. NFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTRB Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the NFLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTRB and NFLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTRB vs. NFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTRB drawdown since its inception was -19.48%, which is greater than NFLT's maximum drawdown of -15.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTRB and NFLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTRBNFLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.48%

-15.17%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-2.42%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.29%

-3.15%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-13.42%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-0.92%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-2.08%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.59%

+0.53%

Volatility

HTRB vs. NFLT - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) at 0.97%. This indicates that HTRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTRBNFLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

0.97%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

3.19%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

4.06%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.12%

4.49%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.54%

4.92%

+0.62%

HTRB vs. NFLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTRB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLT's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTRB vs. NFLT - Dividend Comparison

HTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than NFLT's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTRB
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
4.75%4.66%4.45%3.87%3.08%4.22%4.79%6.30%2.37%0.96%0.00%0.00%
NFLT
Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF
5.48%5.74%5.76%6.02%4.16%3.41%3.63%4.33%4.81%6.23%5.30%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


HTRB and NFLT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTRB has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to NFLT (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTRB dropped -19.48% vs NFLT's -15.17%.

On 5-year performance, NFLT leads with 2.99% vs -0.13% for HTRB. On fees, HTRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, NFLT has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NFLT has performed better with a 2.99% return vs -0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HTRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NFLT.

NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 4.75% for HTRB.

HTRB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while NFLT is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HTRB and 0.50% for NFLT.

NFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTRB and NFLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer