PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HST vs. FGR.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HST vs. FGR.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) and Eiffage SA (FGR.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HST is traded in USD, while FGR.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FGR.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HST achieves a 33.20% return, which is significantly higher than FGR.PA's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, HST has underperformed FGR.PA with an annualized return of 7.15%, while FGR.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.


HST

1D
0.09%
1M
-4.00%
6M
28.07%
YTD
33.20%
1Y
47.44%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
7.15%

FGR.PA

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.60%
6M
-1.61%
YTD
0.03%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HST vs. FGR.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
33.20%7.21%-5.48%27.61%-4.62%18.87%-19.71%16.65%-12.15%10.22%
FGR.PA
Eiffage SA
0.03%70.16%-14.73%12.70%-1.26%10.15%-15.65%40.77%-22.31%60.44%

Correlation

The correlation between HST and FGR.PA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.30

The correlation between HST and FGR.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HST vs. FGR.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HST
HST Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HST Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HST Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HST Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FGR.PA
FGR.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FGR.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGR.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGR.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FGR.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGR.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HST vs. FGR.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) and Eiffage SA (FGR.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSTFGR.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.06

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

0.26

+4.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.47

0.49

+11.98

HST vs. FGR.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HST Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the FGR.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HST and FGR.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HST vs. FGR.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HST drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than FGR.PA's maximum drawdown of -84.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HST and FGR.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSTFGR.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.26%

-84.14%

-11.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-18.30%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.03%

-24.99%

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

-28.40%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.04%

-53.09%

-1.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.01%

-16.76%

+9.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.95%

-33.48%

-7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

9.73%

-5.95%

Volatility

HST vs. FGR.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) is 7.29%, while Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) has a volatility of 7.72%. This indicates that HST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGR.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSTFGR.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

7.72%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.53%

20.27%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.44%

26.13%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.33%

25.68%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.01%

27.54%

+6.47%

Dividends

HST vs. FGR.PA - Dividend Comparison

HST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than FGR.PA's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGR.PA
Eiffage SA
3.96%3.84%4.84%3.71%3.37%3.32%0.00%2.35%2.74%1.64%2.26%2.02%
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
4.10%5.36%5.14%4.62%3.30%0.00%1.37%4.58%5.10%4.28%4.51%5.22%

Financials

HST vs. FGR.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Eiffage SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. HST values in USD, FGR.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


HST and FGR.PA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HST and FGR.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer