FGR.PA vs. ACS.MC
Compare and contrast key facts about Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) and ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA (ACS.MC).
Performance
FGR.PA vs. ACS.MC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGR.PA vs. ACS.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGR.PA Eiffage SA | 11.23% | 50.01% | -9.11% | 9.25% | 5.05% | 18.20% | -22.51% | 43.56% | -18.50% | 40.56% |
ACS.MC ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA | 31.58% | 81.61% | 26.94% | 60.10% | 23.98% | -6.88% | -17.39% | 10.97% | 7.91% | 12.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGR.PA achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than ACS.MC's 31.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FGR.PA has underperformed ACS.MC with an annualized return of 10.19%, while ACS.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 22.04% annualized return.
FGR.PA
- 1D
- 3.81%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 24.79%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
ACS.MC
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 31.58%
- 6M
- 59.38%
- 1Y
- 113.54%
- 3Y*
- 63.18%
- 5Y*
- 39.62%
- 10Y*
- 22.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGR.PA vs. ACS.MC — Risk / Return Rank
FGR.PA
ACS.MC
FGR.PA vs. ACS.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) and ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA (ACS.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGR.PA | ACS.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 3.88 | -2.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 4.30 | -2.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.59 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 14.81 | -12.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | 48.11 | -43.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGR.PA | ACS.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 3.88 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.69 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.72 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.53 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGR.PA and ACS.MC is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGR.PA vs. ACS.MC - Dividend Comparison
FGR.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than ACS.MC's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGR.PA Eiffage SA | 3.45% | 3.84% | 4.84% | 3.71% | 3.37% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 2.35% | 2.74% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 2.02% |
ACS.MC ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA | 1.81% | 2.37% | 4.16% | 4.89% | 7.48% | 7.31% | 7.33% | 5.33% | 4.09% | 3.67% | 3.83% | 4.27% |
Drawdowns
FGR.PA vs. ACS.MC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGR.PA drawdown since its inception was -85.99%, which is greater than ACS.MC's maximum drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGR.PA and ACS.MC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGR.PA | ACS.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.99% | -75.71% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -11.37% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -22.69% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.28% | -70.52% | +17.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -0.98% | -5.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -19.08% | -14.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 3.05% | +4.83% |
Volatility
FGR.PA vs. ACS.MC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) is 7.76%, while ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA (ACS.MC) has a volatility of 11.41%. This indicates that FGR.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACS.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGR.PA | ACS.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.76% | 11.41% | -3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.95% | 22.50% | -6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 28.76% | -4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 22.97% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.34% | 30.22% | -4.88% |
Financials
FGR.PA vs. ACS.MC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eiffage SA and ACS Actividades de Construccion y Servicios SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities