HST vs. HTAB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HST (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.) is a stock, while HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) is Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Hartford. Over the past 5 years, HST returned 11.78%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for HTAB. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HST vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HST achieves a 43.25% return, which is significantly higher than HTAB's 1.70% return.

HST

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 12.29%
• YTD: 43.25%
• 6M: 38.99%
• 1Y: 69.31%
• 3Y*: 22.02%
• 5Y*: 11.78%
• 10Y*: 9.05%

HTAB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 6.59%
• 3Y*: 3.14%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HST vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HST Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.	43.25%	7.21%	-5.48%	27.61%	-4.62%	18.87%	-19.71%	16.65%	-12.80%
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	1.70%	2.86%	1.52%	7.16%	-8.33%	-0.12%	5.41%	7.86%	1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between HST and HTAB is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018	0.02

The correlation between HST and HTAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HST vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HST

HST Risk / Return Rank: 95
HST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
HST Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
HST Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HST Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HST Martin Ratio Rank: 96

HTAB

HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 50
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 53
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HST vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HST	HTAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	1.69	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	2.54	+1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.32	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.35	2.32	+5.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.42	7.23	+12.19

HST vs. HTAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HST Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the HTAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HST and HTAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HST vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HST drawdown since its inception was -95.26%, which is greater than HTAB's maximum drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HST and HTAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	HST	HTAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.26%	-14.76%	-80.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.48%	-2.85%	-6.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.03%	-8.42%	-27.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.03%	-14.76%	-21.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.65%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.00%	-2.88%	-38.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	0.91%	+2.67%

Volatility

HST vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) at 0.90%. This indicates that HST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HST	HTAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.30%	0.90%	+5.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.99%	2.81%	+14.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.16%	3.93%	+20.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.34%	5.74%	+24.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.20%	5.16%	+29.04%

Dividends

HST vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison

HST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than HTAB's 3.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HST Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.	3.78%	5.36%	5.14%	4.62%	3.30%	0.00%	1.37%	4.58%	5.10%	4.28%	4.51%	5.22%
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	3.82%	3.88%	3.57%	3.21%	2.26%	2.18%	1.64%	2.77%	1.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HST and HTAB in my portfolio?

HST and HTAB have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HST or HTAB?

HST has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to HTAB (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HST dropped -95.26% vs HTAB's -14.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.