FGR.PA vs. DG.PA

In the year-to-date period, FGR.PA achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than DG.PA's 8.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FGR.PA has underperformed DG.PA with an annualized return of 8.73%, while DG.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.73% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) and VINCI SA (DG.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FGR.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is comparable to the DG.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGR.PA and DG.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FGR.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than DG.PA's 4.15% yield.

The maximum FGR.PA drawdown since its inception was -85.99%, which is greater than DG.PA's maximum drawdown of -67.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGR.PA and DG.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) and VINCI SA (DG.PA) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eiffage SA and VINCI SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.